Risk & Money Management
Risk of Ruin Calculator
Estimate the probability of hitting a fatal drawdown from win rate, payoff ratio, risk per trade and your ruin threshold. See how smaller risk cuts ruin fast.
Risk of ruin is the probability that a trading account hits a chosen drawdown level before the strategy's edge grows it safely away, given win rate, payoff ratio and risk per trade.
Risk of ruin
1.16%
- Edge per trade
- +0.1R
- Loss units to ruin
- 22.2
- Per-unit ruin root
- 0.8182
Two-outcome model with fixed win/loss sizes; treat as an estimate, not a guarantee.
Worked example
A strategy wins 55% of the time at 1:1 payoff. The trader risks 1% per trade and treats a 20% drawdown as ruin.
- Edge per trade
- 0.55 × 1 − 0.45 = +0.10R
- Per-unit ruin root
- q ÷ p = 0.45 ÷ 0.55 = 0.8182
- Loss units to ruin
- ln(1 − 20%) ÷ ln(1 − 1%) = 22.2 units
- Risk of ruin
- 0.8182²²·² ≈ 1.16%
There is roughly a 1.2% chance of hitting the 20% drawdown before the edge compounds the account away from danger. Risking 2% per trade instead would push that probability up sharply — ruin risk grows exponentially with risk per trade.
How this is calculated
The model treats each trade as a bet that wins +R units of risk with probability p or loses 1 unit with probability q = 1 − p. The per-unit ruin root r* is the smallest solution in (0, 1) of:
p·r^(R+1) − r + q = 0
For a 1:1 payoff this reduces to the classical r* = q ÷ p. The number of consecutive 1R losses that reaches your ruin drawdown under fixed-fractional sizing is u = ln(1 − ruin) ÷ ln(1 − risk), and:
risk of ruin = r*^u
If expectancy (p×R − q) is zero or negative, no amount of sizing discipline helps — the probability is 100% in the long run.
When to use this calculator
Use this when setting or defending your risk-per-trade number. Feed in your strategy's win rate and payoff ratio, pick the drawdown that would genuinely end your trading, and the output shows whether 0.5%, 1% or 2% per trade keeps ruin at a rounding error or a real possibility.
It is most valuable for prop-firm traders and anyone with a hard drawdown limit: set the ruin threshold to the firm's maximum drawdown and the tool becomes an estimate of the probability of failing the account at your current risk settings.
Re-run it whenever your trade statistics update meaningfully. A small drop in win rate or payoff ratio can move ruin risk by an order of magnitude, and seeing that sensitivity is a strong argument for conservative inputs.
Common mistakes
- Feeding in a win rate and payoff from a small or lucky sample — risk of ruin is extremely sensitive to overstated edge.
- Treating the number as exact — the model assumes every trade risks the same fraction with fixed win/loss sizes, which real trading only approximates.
- Setting the ruin threshold at 100% — most traders are stopped far earlier by a prop-firm limit, margin call or loss of confidence, so use the drawdown that would actually end your trading.
Frequently asked questions
- What is risk of ruin?
- It is the probability that an account hits a chosen drawdown level (ruin) before the strategy's positive edge grows it away from danger, given win rate, payoff ratio and risk per trade.
- How is it calculated?
- Each trade wins +R units or loses 1 unit of risk. The per-unit ruin root r* solves p·r^(R+1) − r + q = 0, and risk of ruin = r* raised to the number of 1R losses needed to hit the ruin drawdown.
- Why does risking less per trade help so much?
- Ruin probability is the per-unit root raised to the number of loss units in your drawdown budget. Halving risk per trade roughly doubles that exponent, which shrinks the probability geometrically, not linearly.
- What if my expectancy is zero or negative?
- With no positive edge the model returns 100% — given enough trades, a zero- or negative-expectancy strategy always reaches the ruin level eventually.
- What ruin threshold should I use?
- Use the drawdown that would realistically end your trading: a prop-firm max drawdown (often 6–10%), the point where you'd lose confidence, or a hard personal stop — rarely a literal 100% loss.
- Is this the same as the Kelly criterion?
- No — Kelly gives the growth-optimal risk fraction from your edge, while risk of ruin measures the survival probability of a risk fraction you choose. They answer complementary questions and use the same inputs.